Legal Opinion

Temple v. Reteneller

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided November 7, 1945No. 1215Published

1Opinion of the Court

MacNeille, P. J.,

Francis E. Temple and Mary A. Temple, assignees of Heyer-Kemner, Inc., as plaintiffs, seek to recover from defendants, William Reteneller and Marie J. Reteneller, his wife, certain premises purchased by the Temples, and which are tenanted by defendants. They have had the consent of the rent control authority and the proceedings are apparently regular.

We have before us a rule by defendants to strike off a judgment which plaintiffs have caused to be entered against them in an amicable action and confession of judgment in ejectment. This judgment was entered in accordance with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. DersamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Isman v. NiedermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Hand v. SuravitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API