Legal Opinion

Rathbun v. Rathbun

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This cause was upon the calendar, upon bill, answer, and replication, and noticed ¿or trial or reference.

1Opinion of the Court

Morehouse, Justice.

The authority to refer a cause is derived from, the statute, and when done by the mere authority of the court, is restricted to causes the trial of which will require the examination of a long account, and when so referred, must be to three impartial and competent persons, (2 R S. 384, § 39.) A consequence of referring a cause not referable under the statute, even with consent, was a discontinuance of the suit. In 1836, the Legislature authorized the court to refer to a sole referee, with the consent of the parties, and by further legislation in 1845 a reference of any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lee v. TillotsonNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doyle v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Doyle v. Metropolitan Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  3. People ex rel. Metropolitan Board of Health v. LaneNew York Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API