Legal Opinion

City of Kansas v. Roach

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1990No. Nos. WD 42662, WD 42663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant Thomas E. Roach filed two appeals from circuit court convictions of violations of Kansas City Traffic Ordinances. The appellant supplied this court with legal files in both cases, and then made a motion in each case captioned “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under the provisions of due process of law.” These motions were overruled. The appeals then were consolidated on appellant’s motion. No transcripts have been filed.

During the time that these appeals were pending, appellant filed another, separate “Petition for Habeas Corpus”, which complied with the provisions of Rule 91.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Springfield v. RogersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API