Legal Opinion

Mattingly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 6, 2010No. 5D09-2572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Stephen Mattingly [“Appellant”] entered a nolo contendere plea to possession of methamphetamine and driving while license suspended or revoked, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he was not driving on a street or highway as defined by Florida Statutes when he was stopped for driving with a suspended license. Because the evidence supports the trial court’s factual determination that the road is open to the public, we affirm.

At the hearing on Appellant’s motion to suppress,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. State v. TuckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Angelotta v. Security National InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API