Legal Opinion
Demos v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 2007No. Nos. 04-71523, 05-75384Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Demos first argues that the Board violated due process by failing to inform him that, in the event he changed his address during the pendency of his appeal to the Board, he was required to complete and submit to the Board a form giving notice of the change. We review Demos’s argument of a due process violation de novo. Khup v. Ashcroft, 376 F.3d 898, 902 (9th Cir.2004).
Here, the Immigration Judge ordered Demos excluded on September 26, 1994. Demos appealed the exclusion order to the Board, which dismissed the appeal on February 7, 2000. More than three years later, Demos filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tigran Ekimian Rouzan Nagapetian Avetis Hekimian v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Mooneer Riad Tawadrus v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Mang Khup v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Dalip Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006