Windsor Park Tenants' Ass'n v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurrence
Hawkins, J. (concurring).
I concur in the majority’s conclusion to affirm.
In my view, Special Term properly confined its reasoning to the quintessential issue: are the respondent tenants to be accorded a reasonable opportunity, and at their own expense, to have their own accountants and attorneys examine the appellant landlord’s books and records. There would then follow a further hearing by the Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB), a coappellant, a creature of the Rent Stabilization Law.
Having affirmed the determination that the tenants of this vast apartment house complex are entitled to an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.