Legal Opinion
CelLink Corp. v. Manaflex LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 3, 2025No. 4:23-cv-04231Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CELLINK CORP., Case No. 23-cv-04231-HSG 8 Plaintiff, CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 157 10 MANAFLEX LLC, 11 Defendant. 12 13 On August 18, 2023, Plaintiff CelLink Corp. filed this action against Defendant Manaflex 14 LLC (“Manaflex”) for patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and correction of 15 inventorship.1 Dkt. No. 1. The parties now seek construction of ten terms found in the three 16 asserted patents. Dkt. Nos. 157 (“CelLink Br.”), 160 (“Manaflex Br.”), 163 (“CelLink Reply 17 Br.”). This…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.