Legal Opinion

People v. Sutherland

New York County Courts

Decided March 24, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrancato, J.

When the defendants came on for trial in another part of this court upon an indictment charging grand larceny, second degree, the case was marked off the Trial Calendar and adjourned sine die on motion of the District Attorney. Before its restoration for trial, however, the District Attorney procured a superseding indictment which contained two additional counts charging criminally receiving stolen property. It was upon this indictment that the defendants were convicted by the verdict of a jury after trial and now move in arrest of judgment. This motion must be denied.

We cannot agree with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. . RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SchildhausNew York Court of Special Session · 1958
  2. People v. MollicaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
  3. People v. QuinteroNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API