Berdux v. Project Time & Cost, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) filed by Defendants Project Time & Cost, Inc., PT & C Forensic Consulting Services, P.A. (collectively “PT & C”), Grover Davis (“Davis”), and Ryan Maphet (“Maphet”). Docket No. 12. Plaintiff Bill Berdux (“Berdux”) has filed an Opposition, and Defendants have filed a Reply. Docket Nos. 39, 40. Having considered the papers submitted by all parties, this Court concludes that this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. For the reasons…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Boschetto v. HansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Trustees for the Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. P & J Utility CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- McCard v. CIRCOR International, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Mewawalla v. MiddlemanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Steven Patzer v. Ciena Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026