Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided November 7, 1985No. Civ. A. J85-0143(B)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BARBOUR, District Judge.

This action is presently before the Court on the Motion of Defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), for Summary Judgment. The issue presented by State Farm’s Motion is whether Plaintiff, George Dent Bailey (“Bailey”), is precluded from recovering uninsured motorist benefits from State Farm since Bailey can no longer recover against the uninsured tortfeasor by virtue of the running of the six year statute of limitation.

FACTS

On January 13, 1979, Bailey, a guest passenger in a vehicle driven by John Gordon, was injured…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Sahloff v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rampy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Aitken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Puckett v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kapadia v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Hasper v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Coleman v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
  4. Bolden-Gardner v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API