Legal Opinion

People v. Hoover

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 6, 1973No. 72-271PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GUILD

delivered the opinion of the court:

A complaint was filed by the State on July 31, 1972, charging the defendant with the sale and delivery of alcohofic beverages to a person not of age in violation of Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 43, sec. 131. Twenty-six days later, August 25, 1972, the State’s Attorney moved for a continuance on the grounds of non-availability of his witnesses. The trial court on motion of defendant dismissed the cause stating among other things: “Well, I’ll deny the motion, for continuance on the facts as stated here. It’s a close question but that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ShickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. People v. BarksdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. People v. AbelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. People v. MelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. People v. KenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. FavelaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API