Legal Opinion
Lagrone v. TELECASH INVESTMENTS, INC.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 6, 1996No. A95A2270PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
Telecash Investments, Inc. (“Telecash”) sued Glenn Lagrone for amounts due on a promissory note. Lagrone personally guaranteed the note, which was executed by Seabrook Publications, Inc. (“Sea-brook”). The trial court granted Telecash’s motion for summary judgment, and Lagrone appeals from that order. For reasons which follow, we reverse.
The applicable summary judgment standard is that of Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d 474) (1991). There it was held that “[t]o prevail at summary judgment under OCGA § 9-11-56, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Springer v. GaffaglioCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Allera Corporation v. Derby Cycle CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Peters v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Reeder v. Merrill Lynch Realty Commercial Services of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scoggins v. Arrow Trucking Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
- NationsBank, NA (South) v. PeavyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Telecash Investment, Inc. v. LaGroneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999