Legal Opinion

Lanoce v. Anderson, Banks, Curran & Donoghue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint and cross claim reinstated in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of the motion of defendant Anderson, Banks, Curran & Donoghue (Anderson) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it in this legal malpractice action on a ground not argued by it. Anderson moved to amend its answer to assert the defense of the Statute of Limitations and for summary judgment based on that defense. The court erred in granting summary judgment to Anderson on the ground that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schauer v. JoyceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Ravo v. RogatnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Conroy v. SwartoutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Brown v. Samalin & Bock, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Lee v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quizhpe v. Luvin ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Guayara v. Harry I. Katz, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Grant v. LaTraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Miller v. Mott's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Beneficial Homeowner Serv. Corp. v. Heirs at Large of Ramona E. ThwaitsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API