Legal Opinion

Waldron v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Washtenaw. (Joslyn, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

•Champlin, J.

Plaintiff brought ejectment for a strip of land occupied by defendant as a right of way in the city of Ann Arbor, claiming title in fee. The plea was the general ‘issue. In 1880 plaintiff was the owner in fee of the land in •question. At that time the Toledo, Ann Arbor & North*422eastern Railroad Company was engaged in constructing a railroad, and desired to build it on and over the land in quéstion, and applied to plaintiff, who was secretary of the company, for permission to do so. Plaintiff and said company had been negotiating with reference to this right of way. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Druse v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Putnam v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Purlo Corp. v. 3925 Woodward Avenue, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Root v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Haynie v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Dodge v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API