Legal Opinion

Metze v. Entman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1979No. A2086PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. We affirm the trial court.

The Entmans, plaintiffs below, filed suit against Mattchem, Inc., as maker, and Metze, as guarantor, on a promissory note balance of $5,849.58. 1 Defendant Metze answered the suit by alleging waiver, estop-pel, release, and a general denial and by pleading that the suit be abated until resort was had upon the primary obligor, Mattch-em, Inc. He further cross acted against defendant Mattson on a related claim. Both sides conducted discovery. Certain facts were admitted by the defendant; others were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Old Colony Insurance Company v. City of QuitmanTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Taylor v. Fred Clark Felt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Axcell v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Superior Stationers Corp. v. Berol CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Bridges v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Prairie View a & M UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Gates v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Cassidy v. Northwest Tech Center Associates, Ltd. Ex Rel. Nova Development Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Central Texas Decorating Center v. Mutual Savings InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Replex Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API