Legal Opinion
Devoe v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1903PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
At the Syracuse station of the defendant the track of the Rome, Watertown Ogdensburg branch of its system of railroads enters from the north and makes a connection in the form of a "Y" with track No. 6 which runs east and west. On the 19th of July, 1899, at about noon, train No. 10, consisting of nine or ten cars, entered the station from the north, and after standing upon track No. 6 for a few minutes, was pulled easterly so as to clear the switch at the point of the "Y" and enable another train from the north, known as No. 4, to enter upon the same track and discharge its passengers. Train…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dowd v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Abel v. President, Managers & Co. of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Vedder v. . FellowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Berrigan v. . New York, Lake Erie and Western Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Ford v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Danbois v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Colasurdo v. Central R. R. of New JerseyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
- McCoy v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Payne v. Oakland Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- Reed v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.