Legal Opinion
Anil Goyal v. Gas Technology Institute
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 17, 2013No. 12-3756PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
On June 3, 2013, we issued an opinion affirming the district court’s order quashing an attorney fee lien asserted by Barry A. Gomberg, a former attorney of Anil Goyal. Goyal v. Gas Technology Inst., 718 F.3d 713 (7th Cir.2013). Because we found that attorney Gomberg’s arguments on appeal were frivolous, we ordered him to show cause why we should not impose sanctions under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38. We also saw a possible violation of Rule 1.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct and ordered Gomberg to show cause why we should not forward a copy of the opinion to the Illinois…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Harris N.A. v. Loren W. HersheyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Anil Goyal v. Gas Technology InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monika Salata v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Matter Of LisseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Banaei v. MessingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Jane Girard v. Marissa GirardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
- Wendy Nora v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.