Legal Opinion
Mountain States Division No. 17 v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 16, 1948No. Civ. 2445PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a labor organization within the definition of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, known as the TaftHartley Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq., represents employees of the defendant telephone company in Colorado, New Mexico, El Paso, Texas, Utah, Arizona and Idaho.
The complaint charges defendant with breach of three contracts attached to the complaint. These are so-called bargaining agreements between the plaintiff representing each of the workers in three different departments of the defendant, and Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company. One…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- United Packing House Workers v. Wilson & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1948
- Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 463 v. Texoma Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Milk and Ice Cream Drivers and Dairy Employees Union, Local No. 98 v. Gillespie Milk Products CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Kaufman and Broad Home Systems, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 181 v. Dahlem Const. CoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Textile Workers Union of America v. Aleo Mfg. Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1950
- Associated Tel. Co. v. Communication WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.