Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Alford v. Alford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 1986No. BK-32Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBooth, Chief Judge

I must dissent from the majority opinion, as it appears that the trial judge’s ruling to award primary physical residence of the four-year-old child to the father is based on matters which are not of record and which are not proved below. Further, the evidence presented and the current state of the law on the record here should require the award of custody of the minor child to the mother in view of the evidence of physical abuse committed by the father against the mother. § 61.13(2)(b)2, Fla.Stat. On the other hand, the evidence showed the mother to be a fit parent, and indeed, the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Walden v. WaldenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API