Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Goldman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 26, 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiffs, owners and lessors of premises in the Revere Beach Reservation, bring this bill against Goldman, the lessee of the premises, Stroum, an ássignee of the lease from Goldman, Epstein, a mortgagee of said premises from Goldman, and six insurance companies, to ascertain the amounts due from Goldman and Stroum to the lessors under the terms of the lease, and to reach and apply in payment moneys due as insurance upon structures on the premises which were destroyed by fire on August 2, 1928. All the defendants made answer. After hearing, the trial judge reserved and reported the case…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sanders v. PartridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Sutton v. GoodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Hodgkins v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  4. Mason v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Farrington v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. 68 Beacon Street, Inc. v. SohierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Plaza Investment Co. v. AbelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Gorin v. StroumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Rainault v. EvartsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Kacavas v. ToothackerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API