Legal Opinion

Corgan v. Anderson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeese, J.

We might, with great propriety, refuse to consider this case, for the reason, that no sufficient abstract has been furnished under the rule. The record is quite voluminous, and the writing barely legible, rendering a full abstract essential to a proper understanding of the case.

We gather from it that it was an action of indebitatus assumpsit, for goods, wares, and merchandise, and barrels of whisky, sold and delivered by the plaintiff’s, doing business as partners, to the defendant. The pleas were, non-assumpsit; set-off, with an account filed of the sale and delivery of certain goods, etc.,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MathewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  2. Moshier v. Knox CollegeIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Cooke v. OrneIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Kent v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1877
  5. Ward Pump Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API