Legal Opinion
First Bank of Whiting v. Kham & Nate's Shoes, No. 2, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 17, 1989No. 88 C 10283PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLDERMAN, District Judge:
Appellant First Bank of Whiting (the “Bank”) appeals from the order of the United States Bankruptcy Judge David H. Coar dated October 20,1988. Judge Coar’s order subordinated the Bank's claim against the estate of appellee Kham & Nate’s Shoes, No. 2, Inc. (the “Debtor”) pursuant to the principal of equitable subordination; transferred the Bank’s lien to the bankruptcy estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 510(c)(2); and confirmed the Debt- or’s plan of reorganization. For the following reasons, the decision of the bankruptcy court is affirmed.
FACT…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In the Matter of Mobile Steel Company, Debtor. Elaine E. Benjamin v. Lester Y. Diamond, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Mobile Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc., Debtor-Appellee v. First Bank of WhitingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Scarlata (In Re Scarlata)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Badger Freightways, Inc. v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago (In Re Badger Freightways, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- In Re Pullman Construction Industries Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Aetna Bank v. DvorakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.