Legal Opinion

Wittliff v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1919No. 8074PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Navarro County Court; M. E. Taylor, Judge. Suit by H. A. Wittliif against S. S. Tucker and others. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

.TALBOT, J.

The appellant sued the ap-pellees in the justice court on a promissory note for the sum of $100.85, alleged to have been given for the first year’s premium on life insurance issued to appellees. The ap-pellees pleaded a general denial and failure of consideration in that the policies were never delivered. A trial in the justice court resulted in a yerdict and judgment for the appellees, and appellant appealed to the county court. In the county court a jury was impaneled to try the case, and at the conclusion of the evidence the court peremptorily instructed the jury to return a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. JarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  2. Kirby Lumber Co. v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Grinnan v. RousseauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Bayne v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Carlisle v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Homestead Investments, Inc. v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Schaff v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Bill Wendlandt, 120-MP Victoria Ltd, and Laurent Tower, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy Nos. AOP-170109 and AQS-170213, HDI Global Specialty, SE, F/K/A International Insurance Company of Hannover, SE, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, and Peninsula Insurance Bureau, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API