Legal Opinion
Russell v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 3, 1991No. 90-0259-CV-W-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Judge.
Two motions are pending before this court. They are defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed December 3,1990, and plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, filed March 7, 1991. Plaintiffs filed their Suggestions in Opposition on January 11, 1991, and defendant filed its reply to the motion to dismiss on February 15, 1991. Defendant filed its response to plaintiffs’ motion on March 18, 1991. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion will be treated as a motion for summary judgment and will be denied, 1 judgment will be entered for the plaintiffs as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Edward M. ZollaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Kennedy v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1975
- Paccon, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Powerstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- United States of America, Creditor-Appellant v. John F. Frontone and Kathleen M. Frontone, Debtors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Snyder v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Powerstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- United States v. FrontoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004