Legal Opinion

People v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1908No. Crim. No. 106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.

Appellant' was convicted of the crime of forgery. The information charged the offense to have been committed by altering and changing from $1 to $10 a certain due bill, writing obligatory and clearing-house certificate issued by the Los Angeles clearing-house; and the form of the verdict of the jury was guilty as charged.

It is contended in support of this appeal (1) that the instrument alleged to have been forged is void; and (2) that the information charges both forging and uttering of a forged instrument, and that a verdict of guilty as charged leaves in doubt the question which of the two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MunroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In Re MacKay Ex Rel. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. In Re DriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Osborne v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API