Smith v. Convenience Store Distributing Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
KRAHULIK, Justice.
We accept transfer in this case to address the question of whether the trial court may respond to a juror's question during deliberations without first consulting with the parties. We conclude that, under the circumstances here, the trial court erred in responding.
Janet and Gary Smith (Plaintiffs-=Appellants below) seek transfer after the Court of Appeals affirmed, in a memorandum decision, a judgment on a jury verdict adverse to the Smiths and in favor of Convenience Store Distributing Company (Defendant, Appellee below). Smith v. Convenience Store…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marsillett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Conrad v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- New v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bouye v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Henri v. CurtoIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Tessmann v. Tiger Lee Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Warren v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.