Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Uhlmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Frederick Uhlmann, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of November, 1899, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 5th day o'f December, 1899, denying the said defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

The jilaintiff, as assignee of several persons who made deposits in the Madison .Square Bank on the 1th and 8th of August, 1893, sued the defendants, who were directors of the bank, for fraudulently receiving deposits at a time when they knew that the bank was hopelessly insolvent. The appellant Uhlmann alone defended. ITe gave no evidence upon the trial and the case stood upon the evidence offered by the plaintiff. There was no dispute that the deposits were made by the plaintiff’s assignors as alleged in the complaint. Neither was there any dispute that at that time the bank was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. AnonymousNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Cassidy v. UhlmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frey v. TorreyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  2. Nathan v. UhlmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Predmore v. TorreyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API