Legal Opinion
United States v. Mark Irvine
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1985No. 83-3099PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Per curiam
Mark Irvine appeals his convictions for soliciting a bribe and various narcotics offenses. We affirm.
I
Irvine, a former drug courier, approached the Phoenix police offering information in exchange for money, protection, and immunity from prosecution. He was flown to Seattle in connection with an investigation of Terry Read, a suspected cocaine trafficer. In Seattle, Irvine met with an Assistant United States Attorney who informed him that he would not be given immunity and would have to plead guilty to at least one drug charge, but the court would be informed of his coopertion. He was told not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Harry KurzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Juventino CarrilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Michael Anthony v. Steven Cambra, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Gregory LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Harvey R. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.