Legal Opinion
Hutchings v. Securities Exchange Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 1939No. Docket No. 110, Calendar No. 40,376PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.
On November 23,. 1934, plaintiff’s husband, Paul M. Hutchings, and defendant Albert P. Crell entered into an agreement whereby Hutchings was to receive the sum of $7,500 as consideration for the release by him of certain claims and for services he had performed in connection with an attempted reorganization of the Wolverine Bumper & Specialty Company, which finally resulted in a sale of the assets of said company to a new company known as the Michigan Bumper Corporation. The details of said agreement are of no importance in this litigation. On the same day, Paul M. Hutchings assigned his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- George Realty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Clayton County State Bank v. McMorrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
3Cited by12 opinions
- Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Appeal of Computer Systems of America, Inc., Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore Jay Ambe Corporation and Dore Development Company, Mainstream Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- MacKlin v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.