Delancy v. State

The defendant, George Delaney, moves for rehearing of this Court’s March 31, 2004, per curiam affirmance of the trial court’s denial of his 3.800 motion. After a thorough consideration, we deny rehearing and adhere to our original per curiam af-firmance in this case because the lack of citation to the enhancement statutes in the information does not render the defendant’s sentence illegal.

In 2003, the defendant filed a 3.800 motion, one of numerous post-conviction motions he has filed before this Court. The defendant made the same allegation he has made in his previous post-conviction…