Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barnett v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1992No. 90-SC-926-MRPublished

1Dissent

WINTERSHEIMER,

Justice, dissenting.

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because there is nothing in the briefs or oral argument presented to this Court which indicates that the conviction and sentence of Barnett was improper. In my view the majority has improperly substituted its view of how the case should be practiced for that of Barnett’s trial and appellate counsel.

Barnett’s appellate counsel frames his sole argument on appeal to the effect that the application of the rape shield law in this case denied appellant his constitutional right to confront and cross-examine the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  2. Ford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API