Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. Montague

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket No. 38Published

Appeal from Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Bill by David B. Newcomb against Eunice K. Montague and others to set aside a certain deed, for an accounting, and for other relief. From an order overruling the demurrer of above named defendant, she appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer filed March 31, 1915. The bill of' complaint alleges, in substance, that on the 6th day of October, 1914, the plaintiff recovered a judgment in the circuit court for the county of Grand Traverse against the defendant Herbert B. Montague in the sum of $764.10, and costs; that an execution was issued upon said judgment, placed in the hands of the sheriff, who returned that Herbert B. Montague did not have any property in his bailiwick. Fraudulent conveyances of property by the defendant Joseph A. Mon*76tague were alleged, but the only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eames v. ManleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McKibben v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Vanderpool v. NotleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Blish v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Schelowski v. PawlowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API