Legal Opinion
M. Mirzoeff, Inc. v. Foster & Chadwick Fur Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.
Defendants, American Fur Merchants Adjustment Bureau, Inc., as assignee for the benefit of creditors *861of Foster & Chadwick Fur Co., Inc., and Breecker & Fein, Inc., auctioneers, move to dismiss jshis action as to them on the ground that this court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter. The facts are not in dispute. On March 29, 1962, Foster & Chadwick Fur Co., Inc., made a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors to American Fur Merchants Adjustment Bureau, Inc., which was accepted by the assignee and filed in the office of the County Clerk of New York County. Thereafter,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Brennan v. . WillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- City of New York and the Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Brown v. . GuthrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of John C. Creveling & Son Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cherno v. Bank of BabylonNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- In re the General Assignment for Benefit of Creditors of Bert Lansman & Sons, Inc., New York County Courts1979
- In re: Nussbaum Lowinger LLP, et ano.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2026