Legal Opinion

Rose v. Beaver County

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1902No. Appeal, No. 112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 112, April T., 1902, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Beaver Co., March T., 1902, No. 4, on bill in equity in case of Jacob A. Rose et al. v. Beaver County et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Willson, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was the decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaveb, J.,

In pursuance of the provisions of the Act of assembly of March 29, 1851, P. L. 260, the commissioners named therein purchased a tract of land upon which buildings for the accommodation of the poor of Beaver county were subsequently erected, title to which was taken- in the name of “ The Directors of the Poor and of the House of Employment for the County of Beaver.”

The 4th section of the said act provided: “That the said directors, as soon as may be after their election and organization as aforesaid, shall make an estimate of the probable expense of purchasing the lands…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sugar Notch BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. GilliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. In re Road in the Borough of PhoenixvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Cambria County v. LloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Frost v. CherrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rose v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Sheraden BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Pulaski Township v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Roumfort Co. v. DelaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API