Legal Opinion

Knauss v. Hale

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1942No. 6978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

March 15,- 1937, Harvey S. Hale and Sherman V. Knauss made an oral partnership agreement for the purpose of buying, selling, raising, breeding, grazing, and dealing in sheep, under the • firm name and style of “Hale & Knauss.” About 11 months thereafter, to-wit, April 22, 1938, these parties entered into a written partnership agreement. The written agreement provided, among other things, as follows:

“Knauss furnishes his own labor without cost to the partnership and the labor of his brother, A. L. Knauss, without wage cost to the partnership until the partnership in the opinion of the bank is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diederich v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bussell v. BarryIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gay v. JoplinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
  4. McKeen v. BrooksMontana Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haskin v. GlassIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Hettinga v. SybrandyIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Olsen v. Country Club Sports, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Nelson v. GishIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re Village of RigginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API