Legal Opinion
Phipps v. Gary Drilling Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 4, 1989No. CV-F-88-263 REC TSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COYLE, District Judge.
On July 24, 1989 the court heard defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon due consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties, the court now enters its order granting the motion as set forth herein.
Defendant Gary Drilling Co., Inc. moves, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment on the basis that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to plaintiffs claims of age discrimination in the termination of his employment with defendant.
I. Statement of Facts.
Plainti…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Devlin v. WSi Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Matter of Interco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Kolstad v. Fairway Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Matter of Interco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
- Soto v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.