Legal Opinion
United States v. William P. Van Daal Wyk
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 19, 1988No. 86-1951PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Out-of-court statements made by fellow conspirators of a criminal defendant are, under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E), deemed not to be hearsay if made during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. William P. Van Daal Wyk was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. He contends that the court below erred in finding that statements offered against him at trial fit under 801(d)(2)(E). He contends that the court erred both in finding on the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- United States v. Miguel SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Andrew West, Vertis King, and Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Daniel P. Taglia and Robert J. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Dale J. Doerr, John Paul Doerr, Josephine Christofalos, Christa D. Pixley, and Archie J. PixleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Roberto Gonzalez, Roberto Ramirez, Angel M. Amejeiras, Vicente Chao, Luis Gonzalez, and Rafael IzquierdoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William R. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Juan Herrero Jose Guillermo Haro and Armando N. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.