Legal Opinion

GLENROSE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION v. City of Spokane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 26, 1999No. 16822-1-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

This appeal involves a dispute between the City of Spokane and Glenrose Associates, both of which favor annexation of the Muirfield area of Glenrose Prairie, and Glenrose Community Association, which opposes annexation. The superior court concluded that because the City of Spokane did not have a comprehensive plan that covered the Muirfield area, the City, in considering its annexation, was required to comply with Spokane County’s comprehensive plan for the area. It relied upon the Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) which requires “[e]ach county and city . . . [to] perform its activi ties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Vashon Island Committee for Self-Government v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Clean v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. CLEAN v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1 v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2000
  3. Futurewise v. City Of RidgefieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API