Legal Opinion
Urbish v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 19, 1953No. 14684PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, Justice.
The suit was originally against the Mel-rose-Rexall Drug, Inc. and Urbish for delinquent taxes — years 1950, 1951 — on personal property then owned by the former concern. The judgment appealed from recited that Melrose-Rexall Drug was notoriously insolvent, with dismissal as to it. Appellant Urbish is here protesting the judgment against him of $486.71 covering the same amount of taxes, and the court’s holding that the lien therefor was superior to his antecedent first mortgage or contract lien.
Background of the present controversy and other facts material hereto are reflected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Forwood v. City of TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Fischer v. Rio Tire Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Swarz v. LoefflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Delta County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 1 v. Bank of Mineral WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Wichita Falls v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of Major Appliance Company, Inc. v. City of Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- City of Amarillo v. Ray Berney Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989