Legal Opinion

In re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Joseph De Rario, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.

Wage claimants here seek an order directing an assignee for the benefit of creditors to make payment of the amounts due them. The assignment was made over six months ago. There are assets on hand to pay these claims, at least in large part, unless there be tax claims of an amount greater than any of which the assignee has been advised. Because of the mere possibility of' larger tax claims the assignee asks that the motion be denied, with leave to renew upon the assignee’s final accounting, without in any way indicating when such final accounting will be had.

As tax claims of the United States…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. New York v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. William Filene's Sons Co. v. WeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. In re AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. United States v. KaplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Propper v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API