Rudy v. Harding
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of Carroll, Curry, J.
1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.
This action is instituted to recover the balance due on a promissory note, executed at Louisville, in Kentucky, on the 2d of July, 1840, payable six months after date, and subscribed, “ Harding & Owen.” The note is drawn jointly and severally, for the sum of $1254 90, and is credited on the back by $660 88.
The defendants severed in their defence. Owen pleaded the general issue ; and Harding, after denying that he ever was in partnership with his co-defendant, denied specially his signature to the note sued on, alleging that his name to the said note is a forgery, &c. His answer concludes by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nott & Co. v. DoumingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- Offutt v. BredloveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
- Parker v. BrashaerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- Derbigny v. MondelliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vos v. United InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1801
- Johnson v. MarshSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847