Legal Opinion

Rudy v. Harding

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Carroll, Curry, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.

This action is instituted to recover the balance due on a promissory note, executed at Louisville, in Kentucky, on the 2d of July, 1840, payable six months after date, and subscribed, “ Harding & Owen.” The note is drawn jointly and severally, for the sum of $1254 90, and is credited on the back by $660 88.

The defendants severed in their defence. Owen pleaded the general issue ; and Harding, after denying that he ever was in partnership with his co-defendant, denied specially his signature to the note sued on, alleging that his name to the said note is a forgery, &c. His answer concludes by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nott & Co. v. DoumingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
  2. Offutt v. BredloveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  3. Parker v. BrashaerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  4. Derbigny v. MondelliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vos v. United InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1801
  2. Johnson v. MarshSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API