Legal Opinion

Monte v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 27, 1996No. CR-95-1214PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, James Marvin Monte, pleaded guilty to the unlawful use of a vehicle, a violation of § 13A-8-11, Code of Alabama 1975. He was sentenced to 12 months in the county jail and was placed in a work release program.

The appellant's only contention on appeal is that he was denied his basic constitutional right to counsel. The trial court determined that the appellant was not indigent and, therefore, was not entitled to state-appointed counsel. See § 15-12-1, et seq.; Mays v. State, 497 So.2d 205 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986). The appellant did not retain private counsel. A defendant is entitled to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cobble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Monte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  3. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  4. Ardis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API