Legal Opinion

Amblo's Admx. v. Vermont Associated Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 19, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

In the fall of 1926, Harry J. Novak and his wife, Mary, leased a part of their real estate to Wilbert E. and G. N. E. Burditt, doing business as partners under the name Burditt Brothers. The defendant is an assignee of the lease. The premises covered by the lease were situate in the city of Rutland, and included all that part of a larger parcel that lies on the Main Street side of the Novak property. As the lease describes the property, and as it is shown in a blueprint therein referred to, it includes all the Novak land lying on Main Street, together with the buildings thereon. By the terms…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Jackson v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  4. Racine v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Hamilton v. Minneapolis Desk Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lavallee v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  2. Chicoine v. James E. Cashman, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  3. Law v. Railway Express AgencyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  4. Lavallee v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. Stewart v. Peregrine ContractingVermont Superior Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API