Legal Opinion

Barrett v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 28, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00091Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE EVA MARIE BARRETT, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos. 2:19-CV-091 ) 2:17-CR-092 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Eva Marie Barrett’s (“Petitioner’s”) pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Doc. 1; Criminal Docket (“Crim.”) Doc. 355].1 The United States has responded in opposition [Doc. 8]. Petitioner did not file a reply, and the time for doing so has passed. See Rule 5(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API