Legal Opinion

Clark v. Hammock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1971No. 26704PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

A quo warranto proceeding was brought to have the office of the respondent, a school board member, declared vacant upon the ground that she had vacated such office by moving her domicile from the district which she represented. The jury found against the respondent, her motion for new trial was overruled and the present appeal filed. Held:

1. The trial court instructed the jury: "There must be a concurrence of actual residence and the intention to remain to acquire a domicile.”

Accordingly, the refusal of the trial court to charge this principle of law in the exact words…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  3. Worsham v. LigonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Handel v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Blackwell v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Haggard v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Johnson v. ByrdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Haggard v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API