Legal Opinion
Randolphe G. Roulier v. David E. Wasserstrom and Pelino, Wasserstrom, Chucas & Monteverde, a Now Defunct Pennsylvania Professional Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1986No. 85-1305UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
791 F.2d 935
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
RANDOLPHE G. ROULIER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAVID E. WASSERSTROM and PELINO, WASSERSTROM, CHUCAS &
MONTEVERDE, a now defunct Pennsylvania
professional corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
85-1305
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
4/2/86
AFFIRMED
E.D.Mich.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Billy K. Watkins v. Northwestern Ohio Tractor Pullers Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Schram v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. Ohio Department of Mental Health & Addiction ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023