Legal Opinion

West v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1890No. 14,433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

— This was an action brought upon a promissory note and a mortgage given to secure the same. The note and mortgage were executed by Samuel Smith and Catharine Smith to Andrew Cunningham, who assigned the same by endorsement to the appellee. After executing the note and mortgage, the Smiths conveyed the real estate in fee simple to the appellant John West; the appellants were husband and wife, and Mrs. West was made a party because of the marital relation. The Smiths were not made parties.

A demurrer was submitted to the complaint, but overruled, and an exception reserved; thereafter a decree…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curtis v. GoodingIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Bennett v. MattinglyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Petry v. AmbrosherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Schee v. McQuilkenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Watts v. JulianIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Bachtenkircher, Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Hinson v. GammonSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Coddington v. NeesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API