Van Schooten v. People

The plaintiff in error was convicted upon the charge of owning, operating and having in possession a still, used, designed and intended for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors. He brings error and moves for supersedeas. No instructions were requested. The court instructed the jury orally without objection or exception. It' is now claimed- that the instructions were not sufficient as to the issues of the case, and that no exception was necessary under White v. People, 79 Colo. 261, 268, 245 Pac. 349. That case does not so hold, therefore, since there was no exception to the sufficiency of…