Legal Opinion

Sloan v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The bill herein was filed to recover a deficiency decree on a note secured by mortgage on real property which has been foreclosed.

In this cause the mortgagor sold the property to a third party, who assumed the mortgage debt, and to whom, after maturity, an extension of time in writing on the back of the note was granted, without the knowledge or consent of the defendant mortgagor.

It is conceded that in Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. Carter, 165 Tenn., 628, it was held that in such circumstances the maker of the note was not relieved of liability, but could only be discharged in one of the ways…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cambridge Savings Bank v. HydeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Isaacs v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. McLain v. American Glanzstoff Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Oklahoma State Bank of Sayre v. SeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Graham v. ShephardTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Brown v. P'poolCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API