Holland v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from the First District Court, Cache County.— Hon. Charles H. Hart, Judge. Action to recover damages resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, C. J.
This is an action for the recovery . of damages resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant. The answer, after admitting that it was and is a corporation, denied each and every other allegation of the complaint. It appears from the evidence that the plain tiff, while driving his team, attached to a mowing machine, on the public highway, across the defendant’s railroad, at what was known as the “Knowles Crossing,” was struck by a moving train of the defendant, thereby receiving a. personal injury, his team killed, and the mowing machine broken up. A judgment was rendered in favor of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HaworthUtah Supreme Court · 1902
- Linden v. Anchor Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- Stone v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Anderson v. Daly Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. McCoyUtah Supreme Court · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Smith v. Ogden & N. W. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
- Mellon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Johnson v. Union Pacific Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1904
- Hone v. Mammoth Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.