Legal Opinion

Holland v. Oregon Short Line Railroad

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1903No. 1419PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the First District Court, Cache County.— Hon. Charles H. Hart, Judge. Action to recover damages resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, C. J.

This is an action for the recovery . of damages resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant. The answer, after admitting that it was and is a corporation, denied each and every other allegation of the complaint. It appears from the evidence that the plain tiff, while driving his team, attached to a mowing machine, on the public highway, across the defendant’s railroad, at what was known as the “Knowles Crossing,” was struck by a moving train of the defendant, thereby receiving a. personal injury, his team killed, and the mowing machine broken up. A judgment was rendered in favor of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HaworthUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Linden v. Anchor Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Stone v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. Anderson v. Daly Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. McCoyUtah Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Smith v. Ogden & N. W. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Mellon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Johnson v. Union Pacific Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hone v. Mammoth Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API